60 Ohio App. 2d 227 - Nolte v. Nolte’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
56 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 56 later decisions — most recently August 2021 · most notably 111 Ohio App. 3d 357 - Kilroy v. B.H. Lakeshore Co. (1996), 61 Ohio App. 3d 397 - Bobko v. Sagen (1989)
56 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 56 Ohio App. 2d 144 - Eisenberg v. Peyton · 45 Ohio App. 2d 132 - Logue v. Wilson · 50 Ohio App. 2d 137 - Berry v. Berry
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““* * * [problems arise where the recommended entry form serves the dual purpose of recommending a journal entry and of reporting the referee’s findings and conclusions to the trial judge. In this situation, the report must contain not only a recommendation of the court’s order but also the facts presented to the”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““[T]he trial judge may not render judgment unless and until he has independently analyzed the case; he is [in] no position to make such an analysis unless the referee’s report includes a statement of the facts relevant to the issue before the court.” (Citation omitted.) Id. at 231 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““The report of the referee at the minimum requires a statement of the basis of his findings and recommendations in order that the judge may make an independent analysis of its validity prior to approving the report and entering judgment.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.