Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 60 Ohio App. 3d 76 - State v. Bridge

60 Ohio App. 3d 76 - State v. Bridge’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
March 2020
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently March 2020

8 state decisions

4019891990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Eley · State v. Hankerson · State v. Kulig · 61 Misc. 2d 723 - People v. Centolella · 360 Pa. Super. 452 - Commonwealth v. Michaux

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[B]efore evidence of dog trailing may be admitted, the training and reliability of the dog, the qualifications of the person handling the dog, and the circumstances surrounding the trailing by the dog must be shown.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.