Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

60 Ohio Law. Abs. 270

Pitz v. Hall

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 18, 1950

Ohio Court of Appeals · decided 1950-09-18

Decided 1950-09-18

¶1OPINION

By THE COURT.

¶2We have read and considered the entire.record and find no *271alleged errors well made. Any defect in service was waived by a general appearance on the part of the defendant. Vol. 32, O. Jur. pp. 511, 512. Furthermore, it reasonably appears that Mrs. William B. Hall and Lucille Hall is one and the same person. We find no error in the record which affects the substantial rights of the defendant and in our opinion substantial justice has been done.

¶3Judgment affirmed.

MILLER, PJ, HORNBECK and WISEMAN, JJ, concur.
/60/ohiolawabs/270 · .json · Public domain