State v. Price’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 401 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 408 later decisions — most recently December 2025 · most notably State v. Maurer (1984), State v. Schiebel (1990)
5 federal appellate · 401 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Morissette v. United States · Mullaney v. Wilbur · Cupp v. Naughten · State v. Long
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 408 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A single instruction to a jury may not be judged in artificial isolation but must be viewed in the context of the overall charge.”
21 later decisions quote this exact passage“*** when it is his specific intention to cause a certain result, or when the gist of the offense is a prohibition against conduct of a certain nature, regardless of what the offender intends to accomplish thereby, it is his specific intention to engage in conduct of that nature.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“(A) Where the same conduct by defendant can be construed to constitute two or more allied offenses of similar import, the indictment or information may contain counts for all such offenses, but the defendant may be convicted of only one. {¶ 52} "(B) Where the defendant's conduct constitutes two or more offenses of dissimilar import, or where his conduct results in two or more offenses of the same or similar kind committed separately or with a separate animus as to each, the indictment or information may contain counts for all such offenses, and the defendant may be convicted of all of them.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.