Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 60 OHIOST3D 53 - Davis v. Marion County Engineer

Davis v. Marion County Engineer’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
4
states following
March 2012
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently March 2012

18 state decisions

180199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State ex rel. Ryan v. Murphy · 47 Ohio App. 519 - STATE Ex STALEY v. LAKEWOOD (City) Et · 60 Ohio App. 100 - Babbitt v. Shade · 89 Ohio App. 339 - State Ex Rel. Kraft v. City of Massillon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““1. A public employee may rescind or withdraw a tender of resignation at any time prior to its effective date, so long as the public employer has not formally accepted such tender of resignation. “2. Acceptance of a tender of resignation from public employment occurs where the public employer or its designated agent initiates some type of affirmative action, preferably in writing, that clearly indicates to the employee that the tender of resignation is accepted by the employer.””
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[a]cceptance of a resignation should be in writing and should encompass some type of affirmative act that clearly indicates that the tender of resignation is accepted by someone empowered by the public employee to do so.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “In cases or controversies involving an oral tender, acceptance or withdrawal of resignation, clear and convincing evidence must be proffered to support the validity of such actions if performed in such manner.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.