In re Williams’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

65 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 65 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““In an appeal from an administrative agency, a reviewing court is bound to uphold the agency’s order if it is ‘ * * * supported by reliable, probative, and substantial evidence and is in accordance with law. * * *’ R.C. 119.12; see, also, Univ. of Cincinnati v. Conrad (1980), 63 Ohio St.2d 108 , 17 O.O.3d 65 , 407 N.E.2d 1265 .””

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 81 Ohio App. 3d 500 - Gorenflo v. Ohio Department of Human Services · Cantrell v. State Bd. Emer. Med. Ser., Unpublished Decision (1-5-2007)

2. “* * * convert[ed] its own disagreement * * * into affirmative evidence of a contrary proposition where the issue is one on which medical experts are divided and there is no statute or rule governing the situation.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Snyder v. Ohio Real Estate Appraiser Bd. · State Med. Bd. of Ohio v. Murray

3. “[w]hile the board need not, in every case, present expert testimony to support a charge against an accused physician, the charge must be supported by some reliable, probative and substantial evidence.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State Med. Bd. of Ohio v. Murray · Ridgeway v. Medical Bd. of Ohio, 07ap-446 (3-25-2008)