Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 60 Okla. 88 - Dimmitt v. McDowell

Dimmitt v. McDowell’s Empirical Analysis

1916

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
September 1933
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Spencer v. Minnick · McKenney v. Carpenter · Hubbard v. Cowling

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is true that the article is so written that it could be argued that Mrs. Dimmitt is not charged with theft; biit no reasonable construction could ’be used other than that she wás charged with that crime. The insinuation of theft is strong, and the natural and obvious meaning of the article to those who might read "it is that Mrs. Dimmitt committed the crime of theft.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.