60 Or. App. 12 - Shoulderblade v. Osborn’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
August 1996
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jensen v. Miller · Kontz v. B. P. John Furniture Corp. · Frick v. Hoag · Almond v. Anderegg · Eley v. Miller
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Mutual mistake in relation to reformation means a mistake shared by both parties.... The mistake cannot be mutual if the minds of the parties to the instrument did not meet in a common intent.... [T]he evidence of the mutuality of mistake must relate to the time of the execution of the instrument, and show that at that particular time the parties intended to say a certain thing and by mistake expressed another.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Groff v. Kohler
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.