60 Or. App. 176 - State v. Eaton’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “Further, that I have been employed in law enforcement for 10 years, and it has been my experience based upon 5 years of years [sic] of working involving investigating the growing of marijuana, that in Southern Oregon marijuana plants need considerable cultivation including irrigation and fertilization and that the cultivator generally lives or stays in close proximity to the plants to both care for and guard them due to their high value. It is my further experience that upon harvesting the plants are taken indoors for drying and packing.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 68 Or. App. 164 - State v. Anspach

2. “each affidavit must be examined in a common sense, non-technical manner, looking at the facts recited and the reasonable inferences that can be drawn from those facts. (Citations omitted.) Further, where the existence of probable cause is marginal, the decision should be tempered by the preference to be accorded warrants.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 96 Or. App. 238 - State v. Munro

3. “no other structures observed in close proximity to the growing marijuana.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 68 Or. App. 164 - State v. Anspach