Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

60 Or. App. 322

State v. Neal

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 10, 1982

Court of Appeals of Oregon · decided 1982-11-10

Decided 1982-11-10

PER CURIAM.

¶1Defendant assigns three errors on this appeal from his conviction for rape. First, he contends that his 20-year sentence, with the requirement that he serve a minimum of 10 years before being considered for parole, is cruel and unusual punishment. It is not.

¶2In the second and third, he contends the trial court erred in refusing to provide a transcript on appeal at public expense. Defendant’s appeal is from the sentencing order entered on April 28, 1981. The order denying his motion for a transcript was entered on June 2, 1981. Because the order denying a transcript is not an “intermediate” order under ORS 138.040, the issue defendant raises is not before us. SER Acocella v. Allen, 288 Or 175, 604 P2d 391 (1979); State v. Montgomery, 58 Or App 630, 650 P2d 111 (1982).

¶3Affirmed.

/60/orapp/322 · .json · Public domain