Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 60 P.3d 586 - State v. Beaver

State v. Beaver’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
2
states following
April 2021
most recently cited

38 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently April 2021 · most notably State v. Roggenkamp (2005), State v. Costich (2004)

38 state decisions

270200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 135 Wash. 2d 326 - State v. Riles · State v. Watson · 113 Wash. 2d 929 - Forbes v. City of Seattle · State v. Sledge · State v. Watson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]hen the legislature uses different words within the same statute, we recognize that a different meaning is intended.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A legislative body is presumed not to use nonessential words.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.