¶1 (dissenting). Being unable to- believe that the clear preponderance of the evidence is against the findings of the trial court, I think the judgment and order appealed from should be affirmed.
60 S.D. 168
244 N.W 108
Hewitt v. Carlson
Decided August 30, 1932
South Dakota Supreme Court · decided 1932-08-30
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1932-08-30
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently January 2014
1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →