Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

60 S.D. 607

Gurney v. Gurney

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1932

South Dakota Supreme Court · decided 1932-11-28

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 1977

1 state decisions

Relies on Birken v. Hickey · Keith v. Schievelbein · Dwyer v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1932-11-28

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Where it appears from, the record that the judgment of the trial court was correct, it should not be reversed on appeal, even though based on erroneous conclusions or wrong reasons. Keith v. Schievelbein, 53 S. D. 421, 229 N. W. 858; Birken v. Hickey, 42 S. D. 472, 176 N. W. 137; Dwyer v. Chicago & N. W. R. Co., 41 S. D. 535, 171 N. W. 760. Upon the entitre record in the instant case, a majority of the judges, while not in agreement with the reasoning or conclusions of the trial court, are nevertheless of the opinion that a substantially correct result was arrived at. The judgment and order appealed from are therefore affirmed.

CAMPBELL, P. J„ and ROBERTS, WARREN, and RUDOLPH, JJ., concur.POLLEY, J., dissents.
/60/sd/607 · .json · Public domain