¶1Affirmed. See State v. Sinclair, 995 So.2d 621, 623 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) (“In order to establish prejudice as a result of the failure to advise a defendant of the deportation consequences of a plea, ‘[t]he burden is on the movant to establish that the plea in the case under attack is the only basis for deportation. Only then can the movant show prejudice resulting from the failure to advise of deportation consequences in the case under attack.’ ” (quoting Forrest v. State, 988 So.2d 38, 40 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (emphasis added in original))).
60 So. 3d 511
Perez v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided April 27, 2011
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2011-04-27
Relies on Forrest v. State · De Prospero v. Guardianship of De Prospero
Decided 2011-04-27