Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

60 So. 3d 511

Perez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2011-04-27

Relies on Forrest v. State · De Prospero v. Guardianship of De Prospero

Decided 2011-04-27

PER CURIAM.

¶1Affirmed. See State v. Sinclair, 995 So.2d 621, 623 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) (“In order to establish prejudice as a result of the failure to advise a defendant of the deportation consequences of a plea, ‘[t]he burden is on the movant to establish that the plea in the case under attack is the only basis for deportation. Only then can the movant show prejudice resulting from the failure to advise of deportation consequences in the case under attack.’ ” (quoting Forrest v. State, 988 So.2d 38, 40 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (emphasis added in original))).

/60/so3d/511 · .json · Public domain