Edwards v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 2016
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 410 So. 2d 916 - Cuciak v. State · Thomas v. State · 778 So. 2d 390 - Gammon v. State · Correa v. State · 43 So. 3d 885 - Ruise v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The circuit court found that Edwards violated the conditions of his probation that required him to follow his probation officer’s orders and to submit to electronic monitoring. Both of these violations were grounded on the “bracelet gone” alerts, but the only evidence of the alerts was hearsay. No one from Pro Tech [the monitoring company] established that the alerts occurred or was present to authenticate the report as a business record.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.