State v. Higginbotham’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Sullivan v. Louisiana · Hardy v. United States · 664 So. 2d 94 - State v. Johnson · 338 So. 2d 107 - State v. Ford · 751 So. 2d 214 - State v. Landry
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]here a defendant's attorney is unable, through no fault of his own, to review a substantial portion of the trial record for errors so that he may properly perform his duty as appellate counsel, the interests of justice require that a defendant be afforded a new, fully recorded trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Williams“The trial judge is duty-bound to see that the court reporter makes a true, complete, and accurate record of the trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Williams
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.