60 So. 3d 70 - Molony v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

8 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “no authority in the law for a designation of 'co-domiciliary' parents”); Stewart v. Stewart, 2011-1334 (La.App. 3rd Cir.3/7/12), 86 So.3d 148, 155 (finding”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 169 So. 3d 437 - Distefano v. Distefano · 86 So. 3d 148 - Stewart v. Stewart

2. “Parenting coordination is a child-focused alternate dispute resolution process in which a duly qualified parenting coordinator assists parents or persons exercising parental authority to implement a parenting plan by facilitating the resolution of their disputes in a timely manner and by reducing their child-related conflict so that the children may be protected from the impact of that conflict. The parenting coordinator assists the parties in promoting the best interests of the children by reducing or eliminating child-related conflict through the use of the parenting coordination process.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 140 So. 3d 208 - Hanks v. Hanks

3. “Good cause” includes a determination by the court that either or both parties have demonstrated an inability or unwillingness to collaboratively make parenting decisions without assistance of others or insistence of the court.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 140 So. 3d 208 - Hanks v. Hanks