Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 60 SO3D 899 - Allen v. Briggs

Allen v. Briggs’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Lindsay v. Beneficial Reinsurance Co. · Page v. Preisser · 892 So. 2d 354 - Dzwonkowski v. Sonitrol of Mobile, Inc. · 681 So. 2d 226 - Brown v. Whitaker Contracting Corp. · Schlarb v. Lee

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Of course, the time for appeal would be suspended by a timely filed postjudgment motion directed to the certified judgment, see Rule 4(a)(3), Ala. R.App. P. (‘The filing of a post-judgment motion pursuant to Rules 50, 52, 55 or 59 of the Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure ... shall suspend the running of the time for filing a notice of appeal.’), and, therefore, in those circumstances, the time for appeal would expire upon the grant or denial of the post-judgment motion."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “'[I]f a Rule 54(b) certification is determined to have been improperly entered, the judgment so certified is considered to be nonfinal and therefore unable to support an appeal.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.