Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 60 SW2D 1087 - Anderson v. Paschall

Anderson v. Paschall’s Empirical Analysis

1933

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
November 1991
most recently cited

2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently November 1991

2 state decisions

101933194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hooks v. Bridgewater · Clegg v. Brannan · Douglas v. Ogle

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘Actual fraud’ has a definite meaning in our law. Its distinguishing feature from other types of fraud is the dishonest intention.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.