Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 60 SW2D 258 - Clement v. Scott

Clement v. Scott’s Empirical Analysis

1933

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
September 1979
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently September 1979

5 state decisions

2019331940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Shropshire v. Commerce Farm Credit Co. · Dugan v. Lewis · Fink v. Brown

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “And, if there be inconsistencies and conflicts, they should be construed together so as to give effect to the intention of the parties as collected from the whole contract. Harrison Bldg. Loan Co. v. B. F. Dittmar Co., Tex. Civ. App. 4 S.W.2d 1038”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “`All written instruments whereby a single transaction is consummated are to be taken and construed together. * * *'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.