Trevino v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
December 2014
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Almanza v. State · Highwarden v. State · Muniz v. State · Hernandez v. State · Moore v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Having determined that there was some evidence to warrant submission to the jury of the mitigating circumstance of sudden passion, we cannot conclude that the trial court's refusal to submit such an instruction upon [Trevino's] proper request was harmless.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Trevino v. State“shooting Michelle three times in response to Michelle's provocation in firing her own gun at [him] was an action from which the jury could conclude that [Trevino] was acting under the immediate influence of sudden passion at the time of the killing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Trevino v. State“does not automatically deprive him of the right to an instruction at the punishment phase”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Trevino v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.