Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 60 SW3D 280 - Shilling v. State

Shilling v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
July 2004
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Bruton v. United States · Ohio v. Roberts · Idaho v. Wright · Fahy v. Connecticut

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “• the source and nature of the error; • the extent to which the State emphasized it; • the probable collateral implications of the error; • the weight a juror would probably place upon it, giving consideration to whether the record contains “overwhelming evidence supporting the finding in question”; and • whether declaring the error harmless would encourage the State to repeat it with impunity.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “constitutional error that is subject to harmless error review, the court of appeals must reverse a judgment of conviction ... unless the court determines beyond a reasonable doubt that the error did not contribute to the conviction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.