Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 60 SW3D 738 - State v. Jackson

State v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
August 2007
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Gleaves v. Checker Cab Transit Corp., Inc. · Tidwell v. Collins · Mooney v. Sneed · Lavin v. Jordon · State v. Hill

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]e hold today that section 40-35-114[16] is not the exclusive means for using juvenile court records to enhance sentences in subsequent adult criminal proceedings. Because probation violations are not “delinquent acts” as that term is defined by our legislature, factor (20) does not prevent these violations from being considered under other enhancement factors.... Moreover, because measures less restrictive than confinement have failed, the application of [section 4-0-35-114(8) ] is also proper.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “legislature is not presumed to have passed or enacted useless legislation,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.