Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 60 SW3D 891 - Attorney General v. Redding

Attorney General v. Redding’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
October 2008
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 255th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 666 (§ 466 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Baker Hughes, Inc. v. KECO R. & D., INC. · Wilson v. Work · Brooks v. Texas Employers Insurance Association · Harrison v. Cox · In the Interest of S.C.S.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “may initiate income withholding by issuing an administrative writ of withholding for the enforcement of an existing order as authorized by this subchapter.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. In Re ACB
  2. “Indeed, the very purpose of the administrative writ is to allow withholding without the necessity of court action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. In Re ACB

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.