Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 60 U.S. 183 - John Brown v. _____ Duchesne

John Brown v. _____ Duchesne’s Empirical Analysis

60 U.S. 183 · 1856

Citation profile

331
cited by 331 later decisions
44
cited 44 times by the Supreme Court
8
states following
August 2020
most recently cited

108 federal appellate · 31 district · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 331 later decisions (44 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2020 · most notably Lauritzen v. Larsen (1953), Bob Jones University v. United States (1983)

108 federal appellate · 31 district · 12 state decisions

670185618601870188018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on The Lessee of Henry Brewer v. Jacob Blougher · Samuel Harris v. James Dennie · Adam Mills v. The County of St. Clair and James Harrison

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 331 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`it is well settled that, in interpreting a statute, the court will not look merely to a particular clause in which general words may be used, but will take in connection with it the whole statute . . . and the objects and policy of the law . . . .'”
    32 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “do not, and were not intended to, operate beyond the limits of the United States.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[W]hether any improvement in the construction or equipment of a foreign vessel, for which a patent has been obtained in the United States, can be used by such vessel within the jurisdiction of the United States, while she is temporarily there for the purposes of commerce, without the consent of the patentee.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.