Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 60 UTAH 29 - Price v. Hanson

Price v. Hanson’s Empirical Analysis

1922

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 1976
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Davis v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. · Ex parte Gray

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A party seeking to intervene ... should make it appear ... that he would have been at least a proper party to the action when it was commenced ... and that he would have been entitled to the relief he seeks in a separate action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.