Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 60 Va. App. 35 - Booker v. Commonwealth

60 Va. App. 35 - Booker v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
November 2012
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Koon v. United States · Conyers v. MARTIAL ARTS WORLD OF RICHMOND · Porter v. Com. · Fishback v. Commonwealth · Commonwealth v. Shifflett

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““When the language of a statute is unambiguous, we are bound by the plain meaning of that language. Furthermore, we must give effect to the legislature’s intention as expressed by the language used unless a literal interpretation of the language would result in a manifest absurdity. If a statute is subject to more than one interpretation, we must apply the interpretation that will carry out the legislative intent behind the statute.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.