Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 60 Wash. 2d 151 - Long v. Odell

60 Wash. 2d 151 - Long v. Odell’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
3
states following
June 2016
most recently cited

32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently June 2016 · most notably Harmon v. DEPT. OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERV. (1998), 91 Wash. 2d 603 - State v. Gilcrist (1979)

32 state decisions

130196219701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on City of Phoenix v. Drinkwater · Hall v. Esslinger · Beyer v. Kennedy · Young v. Wierenga · North River Boom Co. v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In his brief on appeal to this court, however, appellant departs from the original questions and, for the first time, makes an attack upon the general intelligibility and constitutionality of the unemployment compensation act. We have many times held that questions which are not raised in any manner before the trial court will not be considered on appeal. [Citing cases.] This general rule is, likewise, ordinarily applicable to defenses and objections based on constitutional grounds.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[T]he case must be made by the parties litigant, and its course and the issues involved cannot be changed or added to by friends of the court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.