Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 60 Wash. 2d 397 - State v. Lundquist

60 Wash. 2d 397 - State v. Lundquist’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

61
cited by 61 later decisions
2
states following
March 2012
most recently cited

61 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 61 later decisions — most recently March 2012 · most notably 119 Wash. 2d 178 - Kadoranian v. Bellingham Police Department (1992), 117 Wash. 2d 175 - In the Matter of Personal Restraint of Powell (2004)

61 state decisions

240196219701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 108 Ohio St. 239 - Walls v. Mitchell · 133 Ohio St. 50 - State Ex Rel. Cozart v. Carran

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A person may not urge the unconstitutionality of an ordinance or statute unless he is harmfully affected by the particular feature of the ordinance or statute alleged to be an unreasonable exercise of the police power. A litigant who challenges the constitutionality of an ordinance must claim infringement of an interest peculiar and personal to himself, as distinguished from a cause of dissatisfaction with the general framework of the ordinance.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “whether the ordinance permits or licenses that which the statute forbids and prohibits, and vice versa . . . Judged by such a test, an ordinance is in conflict if it forbids that which the statute permits”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.