Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 60 Wash. 2d 638 - State v. Michaels

60 Wash. 2d 638 - State v. Michaels’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

112
cited by 112 later decisions
11
states following
September 2019
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 104 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 112 later decisions — most recently September 2019 · most notably 97 Wash. 2d 92 - State v. White (1982), 106 Wash. 2d 144 - State v. Stroud (1986)

6 federal appellate · 104 state decisions — followed in 11 states

290196219701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jones v. United States · Harris v. United States · United States v. Lefkowitz · Amos v. United States · State v. Gibbons

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 112 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “an officer may take into custody a person who commits a misdemeanor in his presence, and upon making the arrest, may search the person and his immediate environs for evidence of the crime or tools which would aid in the arrested person's escape.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “An arrest may not be used as a pretext to search for evidence.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The evidence in this case conclusively shows that the arrest was made for the sole purpose of searching the automobile to ascertain whether it contained any contraband property. It was a mere pretext for the search and was therefore unlawful.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.