60 Wash. App. 175 - State v. Aamold’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 2002
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Davis v. Alaska · 54 Ill. 2d 280 - People v. Pickett · 109 Wash. 2d 222 - State v. Thomas · United States v. Calabro · 93 Wash. 2d 823 - State v. Cunningham
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Under CrR 3.1(f), an indigent defendant is entitled to the assistance of an expert witness only if such services are necessary to an adequate defense. State v. Barnes, 58 Wn. App. 465, 472 , 794 P.2d 52 , review granted, 115 Wn.2d 1022 (1990)[, affirmed, 117 Wn.2d 701 , 818 P.2d 1088 (1991)]. Whether the services of an expert are "necessary" within the meaning of this rule is committed to the sound discretion of the trial court, reversible only on a showing of substantial prejudice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hermanson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.