60 Wash. App. 184 - State v. Weiding’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
13 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 113 Wash. 2d 679 - State v. Leach · 104 Wash. 2d 315 - State v. Holt · 37 Wash. App. 856 - State v. McGary · 36 Wash. App. 454 - State v. Krup · 87 Wash. 2d 760 - State v. Jeske
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To convict the defendant of the crime of simple assault, each of the following elements of the crime must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt: (1) That on or about the_day of_, 19_, the defendant assaulted [name of person]; and (2) That the acts occurred in_County, Washington.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“(1) Every person who, under circumstances not amounting to assault in the first degree shall be guilty of assault in the second degree when he: (c) Shall knowingly assault another with a weapon or other instrument or thing likely to produce bodily harm[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[u]nder Washington law an assault is, by definition, an intentional act.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.