60 Wash. App. 592 - State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
11 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2251 (Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 2252
Relies on New York v. Ferber · Stanley v. Georgia · Osborne v. Ohio · Anthony v. United States · 106 Wash. 2d 54 - State v. Gunwall
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] reasonable probability that criminal activity was occurring `at or about the time the warrant was issued.' State v. Higby, 26 Wash.App. 457, 460 , 613 P.2d 1192 (1980). `Tabulation of the intervening number of days' is one of the factors to be considered, but is not controlling. Higby, supra at 460 , 613 P.2d 1192 . Other factors to be considered include the nature of the crime, the nature of the criminal, the character of the evidence to be seized, and the nature of the place to be searched. See 2 W. LaFave, section 3.7(a), at 77; Higby, supra.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.