State v. Pike’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 35 Wash. App. 862 - State v. Latham · 32 Wash. App. 4 - I-5 Truck Sales & Service Co. v. Underwood · 42 Wash. App. 195 - Pacific Gamble Robinson Co. v. Chef-Reddy Foods Corp. · State v. Nelson · 38 Wash. App. 675 - Webb v. Ray
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a person, other than the actor, who has possession of or any other interest in the property or services involved, and without whose consent the actor has no authority to exert control over the property or services.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“wrongfully obtain or exert unauthorized control over the property or services of another or the value thereof, with intent to deprive him of such property or services”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the person from whom property is taken had a right of possession superior to that of the defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.