Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 60 Wash. App. 813 - State v. Davis

60 Wash. App. 813 - State v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
states following
January 2008
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Gideon v. Wainwright · Porter v. States · 110 Wash. 2d 682 - State v. Scott · 113 Wash. 2d 679 - State v. Leach

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) intending to inflict bodily injury on another, accompanied with the apparent present ability to do so, (2) intentionally creating in another person reasonable apprehension and fear of bodily injury, and (3) intentionally committing an unlawful touching, regardless whether physical harm results.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) A person is guilty of assault in the fourth degree if, under circumstances not amounting to assault in the first, second, or third degree, or custodial assault, he or she assaults another.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[T]he 'essential elements' rule requires that a charging document allege facts supporting every element of the offense, in addition to adequately identifying the crime charged.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.