60 Wash. App. 914 - State v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently February 2018
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 106 Wash. 2d 514 - State v. Nordby · 115 Wash. 2d 445 - State v. Pryor · 108 Wash. 2d 125 - State v. Pascal · 112 Wash. 2d 419 - State v. Herzog · 43 Wash. App. 340 - State v. Harp
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“. 60 Wn. App. at 919 . For example, a defendant in theory might be a candidate for therapy but would not be”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The record has no information about whether an appropriate treatment program was available for [defendant] or whether he would be eligible for such treatment. Likewise, nothing in the record indicates whether [defendant's] treatment following the 1974 conviction was successful or whether he currently is responsive to treatment, as Pryor requires. It is possible, perhaps probable, that a mental health professional would conclude that [defendant] would not benefit from therapy because he [committed the current offense] after receiving 26 months of sexual deviancy treatment. However, no testimony was presented that would permit such a determination.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the Washington courts recognize that a finding of future dangerousness may justify the imposition of an exceptional sentence when a defendant poses a threat to the community 'beyond that which could be ameliorated by incarceration for a period conforming to the standard range.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.