Headley v. Hoopengarner’s Empirical Analysis
1906
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 district · 34 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently June 2019 · most notably 153 W. Va. 222 - United Fuel Gas Company v. Battle (1969), Paxton v. Benedum-Trees Oil Co. (1917)
3 federal appellate · 1 district · 34 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Williamson v. Jones · Hukill v. Myers · Capehart's Ex'r v. Dowery · Conrad v. . Morehead · 43 W. Va. 283 - Newlon v. Wade
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““While there is a provision in the deed made by the guardian in the summary proceeding to the effect that a failure to comply in all respects with the terms' and stipulations of the deed would work a forfeiture, and that the property would revert to the heirs, there is no claim that the lessees have failed in any respect to comply with the contract, except as to the payment of four-fifths of one-sixteenth of the oil production, and this was because of the complications which gave rise to this litigation. They placed a different construction upon the contract from that given it by the heirs, and have so confided in their construction as to litigate it through this court for decision. This is not such a voluntary and willful failure and refusal to comply with its provisions as should work a forfeiture of the estate acquired under the deed. It appears from the record that, their failure to pay must have been in good faith, relying upon their construction of the deed. To impose a forfeiture is a harsh penalty, and courts are slow to do so, except where it is plainly demanded.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hutchinson v. McCue
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.