Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 600 F.2d 407 - Bifulco v. United States

Bifulco v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

600 F.2d 407 · 1979

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
June 1999
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 1999

16 federal appellate · 1 district ·

150197919801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

Relationships

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 963 · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Callanan v. United States · Prestidge v. United States · Armedo-Sarmiento v. United States · United States v. Lyles

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Any person who attempts or conspires to commit any offense defined in this subchapter is punishable by imprisonment or fine or both which may not exceed the maximum punishment prescribed for the offense, the commission of which was the object of the attempt or conspiracy.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Any person who attempts or conspires to commit any offense defined in this title is punishable by imprisonment or fine or both which may not exceed the maximum punishment prescribed for the offense, the commission of which was the object of the attempt or conspiracy. 4 The object of the conspiracy at issue in this case was the commission of the substantive offense defined in § 401(a) of the Act, 21 U.S.C. § 841(a). That subsection reads: 5”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.