Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 600 F.2d 590 - Hoffman v. United States

Hoffman v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

600 F.2d 590 · 1979

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
January 1985
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2680

Relies on Dalehite v. United States · 251 F. Supp. 391 - Gibbs v. United States · Hoffman v. United States · Bristow v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““This Court is convinced that the FAA’s failure to demand proper insurance coverage before issuing an ATCO certificate in the instant case was in no way connected to the cause of the later crash.. . This Court finds that the sole proximate cause of this accident was pilot negligence and therefore declines to consider the complex legal issues involving the Federal Tort Claims Act...” Id. at page 591”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““We observe that if we were to reach the ‘complex legal issues involved in the Federal Tort Claims Act’ referred to above, we would be forced to find that 28 U.S.C. § 2680 (a) and (h) constitute exceptions from Federal liability under the Tort Claims Act, which also served to bar plaintiff’s cause of action in this case.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.