Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Health & Welfare Fund v. Old Security Life Insurance’s Empirical Analysis
600 F.2d 671 · 1979
Citation profile
24 federal appellate · 4 district · 10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 66 later decisions — most recently July 2012 · most notably Levy v. Lewis (1980), Thornton v. Evans (1982)
24 federal appellate · 4 district · 10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United States · Will v. Calvert Fire Insurance · Donovan v. City of Dallas · Pennsylvania v. Williams
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Upon timely application anyone shall be permitted to intervene in an action: .... (2) when an applicant claims an interest relating to the property or transaction which is the subject of the action and he is so situated that the disposition of the action may as a practical matter impair or impede his ability to protect that interest, unless the applicant’s interest is adequately represented by existing parties.””
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) The application must be timely. (2) The applicant must claim an interest relating to the property or transaction which is the subject of the action. (3) The applicant must be so situated that the disposition of the action may as a' practical matter impair or imped'e his ability to protect that interest. (4) The applicant’s interest is or was not adequately represented by existing parties.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“cannot be interpreted as precluding a party from pursuing a congressionally created federal claim in the only courts able to provide affirmative relief on that claim.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.