Joseph v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
600 F.3d 1235 · 2010
Citation profile
12 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Ventura · Chun He Li v. Ashcroft · Alvarez-Santos v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Singh v. Gonzales · Varsha Tushar Shah v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 68 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the IJ properly presided over both [the removal and bond] proceedings”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Sales v. Johnson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.