Kuck v. Danaher’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “First, the private interest that will be affected by the official action; second, the risk of an erroneous deprivation of such interest through the procedures used, and the probable value, if any, of additional or substitute procedural safeguards; and finally, the Government's interest, including the function involved and the fiscal and administrative burdens that the additional or substitute procedural requirement would entail.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Dukes v. N.Y.C. Employees' Ret. Sys.

2. “a delay amounts to a due process violation only where it renders the prescribed procedures meaningless in relation to the private interest at stake. [T]he mere assertion that state remedies are lengthy ... will not render state remedies inadequate [under the Due Process Clause] unless they are inadequate to the point that [they are] meaningless or nonexistent.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Dukes v. N.Y.C. Employees' Ret. Sys.

3. “1) he has an interest protected by the First Amendment; (2) defendants' actions were motivated or substantially caused by his exercise of that right; and (3) defendants' actions effectively chilled the exercise of his First Amendment right.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Collins v. City of N.Y.