Pablo-Sanchez v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
600 F.3d 592 · 2010
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (§ 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1231 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-Zacarias · Khalili v. Holder · Gilaj v. Gonzales · Marku v. Ashcroft · Hamida v. Gonzales
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“But to say that the Board could find circumstantial proof of persecution in a given case is not to say that it must ,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Cruz-Guzman v. Barr“connect[ing] the dots of circumstantial evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Cruz-Guzman v. Barr
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.