Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 600 NE2D 951 - Cua v. Morrison

Cua v. Morrison’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
April 2014
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently April 2014

7 state decisions

30199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Locke · 174 Ind. App. 537 - In the Matter of Estate of Newman · State v. Hogan · 160 Ind. App. 289 - Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. Vanover · Schwedland v. Bachman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “to compel the execution of any document.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"This release authorizes the physicians, dentists, chiropractors, nurses, therapists, hospi-tais, clinics, dispensaries, home health care centers, psychiatrists, psychologists, social workers, or any other medical facility or health or social worker or care provider to discuss with, release for copying or provide copies to Robert C. Riddell, or any other representative of the firm of Locke Reynolds Boyd & Weisell, ... the following: any and all medical records, reports, X-rays, hospital records, evaluations or tests, photographs, notes, bills, payment schedules, prescriptions, or any other results of investigation, diagnosis, treatment or prognosis concerning injuries, ailments, disabilities, deformities, handicaps or pains claimed by or in connection with the below-described condition of the above plaintiff. This Authorization shall extend to any condition, past or present, of this patient which is in any was causally or historically relevant to the claim of Rosita L. Cua of physical, mental and emotional injuries allegedly resulting from an automobile accident which occurred on or about the 14th day of March, 1990, in the City of Indianapolis, Indiana. This Authorization is made in connection with litigation involving this patient.” Record at 18-19.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “'It is easy to see that the administration of justice might be seriously embarrassed, and vexatious delays secured, if appeals could be taken in every case where a written instrument is ordered to be produced for use as evidence on the trial of the cause”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.