Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 600 P2D 1056 - Van Order v. State

Van Order v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
7
states following
December 2009
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently December 2009

2 federal appellate · 16 state decisions

701979198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Schmerber v. State of California · Cupp v. Murphy · State v. Oevering · People v. Fidler · 31 Cal. App. 3d 635 - Carrington v. Superior Court

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'the factual situation gave rise to a charge of vehicular homicide or the potential for such a charge, [the implied consent] statute would have no applicability. A blood test may be taken incident to an arrest for such a crime and may be admissible without regard to the Implied Consent Law.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “presence of alcohol in the blood is evanescent and disappears readily with the passage of time.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “'in spite of the fact that the person searched is not formally under arrest'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.