Archer v. Ogden’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently September 2016
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Baird v. State Bar of Arizona · In Re Integration of State Bar of Oklahoma · Opinion of the Justices to the Senate · Smith v. State · Charlton v. Federal Trade Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The Supreme Court of the State of Oklahoma shall have exclusive power and authority to pass upon qualifications and fitness of all applicants for admission to practice law in the State of Oklahoma, and the qualifications of such applicants shall be those which are now or may be hereafter prescribed by the statutes of Oklahoma and the rules of the Supreme Court.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Lynch““(a) No attorney shall practice law in the State of Oklahoma who is not an active member of the Association, except as herein provided.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Lynch
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.