Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 600 P2D 337 - Cunningham v. State

Cunningham v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
May 1988
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Williams v. State of Oklahoma · Lathem v. United States · Robert Lowell Rogers v. The United States of America, Waldo Kent Ferguson v. The United States of America · Fields v. State · 72 Okla. Crim. 393 - Wagner v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is the responsibility of the defense attorney to preserve grounds for reversal in the record and failure to do so will generally be fatal on appeal. This Court will not assume facts not in the record and must conclude that no such motion was filed and that the issue was raised for the first time on appeal. [Citations omitted.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.