Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

600 So. 2d 1203

Ragar v. Ragar

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1992-06-05

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 1994

1 state decisions

Relies on 472 So. 2d 1145 - Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. Rowe · Groover v. Walker

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1992-06-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm the ruling of the trial court denying the parties’ motions for modification. We reverse the award of attorney fees on authority of Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund v. Rowe, 472 So.2d 1145 (Fla.1985).

¶2For the benefit of the trial judge, we point out that a successor judge may not correct errors of law committed by his predecessor, and, hence, he cannot review and reverse on the merits and on the same facts the final orders of his predecessor. Groover v. Walker, 88 So.2d 312 (Fla.1956).

COBB and HARRIS, JJ., concur.GRIFFIN, J., concurs in part, dissents in part, with opinion.
/600/so2d/1203 · .json · Public domain