Jones v. Zagrodnik’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently December 2013
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 581 So. 2d 162 - Lott v. State · New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Hart · Ellis v. Humana of Florida, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The estate and the survivors suffered loss, not directly from the collision, but from the loss of the deceased who was killed in the accident. All their claims are derivative from the deceased . . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[T]he policy limits recovery based on the number of persons injured as a result of the operation of the insured's automobile.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.