600 So. 2d 1293 - Hebert v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently April 2010
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 500 So. 2d 501 - Williams v. State · 597 So. 2d 798 - Johnson v. State · 530 So. 2d 308 - Hoover v. State · 596 So. 2d 1220 - Peralta v. State · 563 So. 2d 836 - Mack Industries, Inc. v. Wille
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Where a defendant enters into a plea agreement that is not thereafter challenged and by which the charge of felony grand theft is reduced to misdemeanor petit theft, but which agreement does not restrict the amount of restitution that may be imposed, and where the State in fact proves by a preponderance of the evidence an amount consistent with the original charge, is the trial court nonetheless restrained by the plea to petit theft to impose an amount of restitution no greater than $300.00?”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hebert v. State“damage or loss caused directly or indirectly by the defendant's offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hebert v. State“[r]estitution to be determined by court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hebert v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.